Forward-Facing Sonar Units and the
‘Harass-A-Bass’ Technique Have Changed Bass Fishing Forever
Date: |
3/9/23 |
Interview: |
Gary Dobyns |
Subject |
Front Facing
Sonar |
Interviewer: |
Craig Gottwals,
Forward by Zander |
Forward by Zander: The first time I saw live sonar technology was at
a media event in Florida back in 2019. The team from Garmin showed us live sonar
on a pole placed underneath the side of the boat and we could see the actual
shapes of the snook darting in and out of the beam. I remember even being able
to see the bait they were chasing and thinking that is really cool, but I didn't
fully comprehend just what a game changer this technology would be for bass
anglers. That came years later when Garmin Livescope was already being used by
professional anglers. I was fishing with Pro Anglers David Mullins and Jeff
Gustafson in Florida and watched them fish with their heads down, adjusting
their presentations and literally placing baits directly in front of fish, and
the amount of fish they were able to see and convert was eye opening. They
taught me how to use the technology and forward facing sonar went from a "nice
to have" to something I "had to have" on my own boat.
After seeing forward facing sonar
in action I knew I had to have it on my boat. Now I can't imagine fishing
without it.
I've now been fishing with Livescope for two
seasons and to say it has changed the way I fish would be an understatement.
Almost every technique, from finesse fishing on the bottom to adjusting retrieve
speeds and actions with big glidebaits can be made more effective with forward
facing sonar. The ability to analyze structure and how fish relate to it,
eliminate wasted casts, and better target fish on days when the bite are tough
have all vastly improved my effectiveness as an angler. Today I can't imagine
fishing without Livescope.
Whether it is finessing fish with
light line or varying retrieved with swimbaits, forward facing sonar has changed
the game
I was talking about how the technology continues
to change the game, and how polarizing it can be, with
Craig Gottwals,
an outdoor writer whom I actually met two decades ago when he bought my first
bass boat. Craig had been studying the technology and had a lot of firsthand
experience with it, as well as an interesting chronicle that involved Tournament
Angler and Owner of Dobyns Rods, Gary Dobyns. I've fished with Gary many times,
maybe even shared a donut or two, and the minute I heard "Dobyns" I knew it was
going to be a good story. This is that story.
Forward-Facing Sonar Units and the ‘Harass-A-Bass’ Technique Have Changed Bass
Fishing Forever
By Craig Gottwals
Introduction: The rumors percolated pre-pandemic of
an electronics guru devouring the competition in America’s largest crappie
tournaments. Fishing in a previously unimagined futuristic manner, from the
not-so-bass-mecca state of Oklahoma, Josh Jones is reported to have caught more
than 200 ten-pound fish in less than five years. Dobyns Rod owner and bass
tournament legend
Gary Dobyns first met Josh Jones through a former business
partner and two-time national crappie fishing champion, Matt Morgan.
Talking to Pro Angler and Owner of
Dobyns Rods, Gary Dobyns
“Gary, you need to meet him and get on a boat with him. I’m telling you right
now. He’s the best crappie angler on the planet, and once he transitions to
bass, he’s going to catch more big fish than anyone ever has,” Morgan told
Dobyns.
I remember those words well because they were virtually identical to what Gary
told me in the Winter of 2021. We were fishing California’s Lake Oroville with
the first generation of forward-facing sonar, and Gary was trying to show me how
to use it. I’ll wait for the western guys to prove me wrong, which is certainly
a possibility. But from my limited understanding of this weapon and its primary
utility, Lake Oroville might be the second worst body of water on which to use
it due to Oroville’s seemingly infinite number of one to two-pound fish. The
worst would be shallow delta fishing. But on the deeper river channels in search
of stripers – well, that is likely to be a different story.
“Craig, this ain’t it. What you are seeing today is nothing like what Josh does.
I can’t do it. It’s going to take years of practice, and then I still may not be
able to do it. You have to understand, he’s only really been bass fishing for a
year. He’s still learning the game. And he’s already caught more fish over ten
pounds than anyone I know!”
I stood behind Gary on the front deck of his boat as he tried to keep the cone
of sonar on a larger-than-average fish he spotted on the forward-facing unit.
The spotted bass left him in the dust three seconds later.
“Damn it!” Gary yelled for what seemed like the 50th time that day. “I just
can’t stay on ‘em. That’s the whole deal. Josh is so good at staying with the
fish. He has the trolling motor on max speed, and he is moving. He’s on it, even
if that means he has to shoot 90 degrees to the right or left or reverse it 180
degrees. “
“Does he keep the trolling motor on its max when he turns and reverses?” I
asked.
“Yes. All the time. He never turns it down, and he never takes his foot off the
pedal. You better hold on tight when you stand up there with him, or you’re
going swimming. Craig, he might only make 50 casts in a full day on the water.
You get him out there, and he’s one hundred percent totally focused on that
screen, finding and staying on big fish. Then he just flips his bait in front of
the fish and watches how the fish reacts. He can tell immediately if the fish is
going to bite. Then he adjusts accordingly.”
As for his choice of bait, Jones began with large flutter spoons before
graduating to Alabama Rigs (A-Rigs). In Gary’s first Oklahoma foray with him,
Jones was using A-Rigs.
“So, he finds the big one, engages in carnival acrobatics to keep the fish in
the cone of his forward-facing sonar, and then just swims an A-Rig in front of
it?” I asked.
“Kinda, but he really sort of drop-shots with it.”
“C’mon, man! He’s drop-shotting A-Rigs and catching a higher percentage of ten-pounders
than anyone in history?”
“He is, dude! I’d never have believed this if I didn’t see it myself. You need
to fish with him. You have to. If we could get Rich (Gary’s son Richard Dobyns)
on a plane, I’d pay for both your tickets and send you up to Oklahoma to see it
yourself!”
I was still skeptical.
I believed in the results. I saw the pictures and the short videos on Gary’s
phone. But did I really want to dabble with a technique that forced me to keep
my head down on a twelve-inch screen while running my trolling motor like a
tweaker with a firecracker up my ass? I know me. I’m already tech-allured and
too enamored with deep offshore fishing. If I put this on my boat, I may never
run the bank again.
Underwater tunnel showing fish
inside on Lake Shasta. Photo by Tony Franceschi (Photo courtesy of Craig
Gottwals)
The Sonar-Whisperer
Today, the cat is all the way out of the bag. You can watch a mind-blowing
90-minute interview Josh gave to Chris and Trait Zaldain on their podcast,
here.
Josh gives it all away in this interview, and Chris and Trait do a fantastic job
of drawing it out of him. Chris traveled to O.H. Ivie a few days before the
interview to try and do what Josh does so that he could better interview Jones.
Chris openly admits that he previously thought Jones’ style of fishing would not
be too tricky on the right lake (open, deeper water with a plethora of big
fish). Chris spent days before the interview trying to replicate Josh’s
technique.
His assessment? And I’m paraphrasing here – what you do is hard, man! This is
not easy at all!
You can watch that for yourself in the podcast. It is great. It is an elite
professional basser at the height of his game offering props to a creative
genius for mastering a new form of the craft. I’ve never met Josh. I think I
spoke to him briefly once, over Gary’s speakerphone, while we struggled to
emulate Josh’s technique on the water. I knew just from Gary’s descriptions of
him and his friendship with him that I was going to like the guy.
The Zaldain interview does nothing to change that. It just reinforces Josh’s
likeability. He gives it all away. He knows that others will eventually become
better than him at this game, and he doesn’t care all that much. Plus, as he
explains in the interview, Josh is tired of being accused of cheating. So now,
he has a video camera running while he fishes, and he makes his most absurd
achievements public.
Way back in the mid-20-teens, Josh Jones the cable guy, went to the home of a
fellow Oklahoma resident with TV reception issues. Josh fixed the problem, and
as a tip for his excellent service, the customer gave Josh a prototype
forward-facing sonar unit. The customer, an executive at one of the nation’s
largest sonar manufacturers, had the units in his garage and figured if anyone
had the technology savvy to hook it up, figure it out, and make it work, it
might be this crappie fishing cable guy.
He was right.
As Josh explains to Chris and Trait in their podcast, there were no
instructions, no links to videos, nothing. He just had to figure it out.
Nearly a decade later – mission accomplished!
Not convinced? Check out this
video of Josh catching five bass that weigh a
combined 61.37 pounds. A mere 12.27 pound-per-fish average. Josh guesses he’s
caught more than 100 bass over ten pounds, but openly admits that he’s lost
track of them.
Gary scoffs at the number and thinks it is probably well over 200.
Josh Jones with a bruiser
from Lake O.H. Ivie in Texas. (Photo courtesy of Dobyns and Gottwals)
It’s Not Fishing
I know you won’t believe this, but if you comb social media and the bass fishing
forms online, you’ll find both love and vehement hate for what Josh is doing. I
know! The internet housing divergent and inanely emotional responses to stuff?
Who’d have imagined?
The purist and traditionalist fishermen are, by and large, not big fans of
forward-facing sonar and what it is doing to the sport. One day on the boat with
a lifelong buddy and artist, Paul Hermann, I described in painstaking detail
what Josh was doing and how this technique worked. Paul is a phenomenal artist
and goes about things quite differently than I do. I compile data, keep
statistics, and log all fishing trips. In my day job, I use the same analytical
skills to assess risk for companies. Paul rolls by feel, mood, and experience.
“So, you just find the big fish, and then the most important skill becomes
working your foot pedal to stay on it while keeping it on your video screen?” He
asked.
“Yeah, that’s it in a nutshell. And the longer you stay on that fish, and the
more you piss it off with something as outlandish as an A-Rig in its face, the
more likely you are to catch it.”
“So, it’s not seduction. You aren’t alluring the bass with deception and
enticement? You are there to provoke it after incessant needling? You harass it
until it lashes out? They ought to call it harass-a-bass,” Paul said.
“Wow. Great term, dude. That one is going to stick.”
To be fair, it is so much more than that. It may have started out that way in
the early days when Josh began this quest. But now, nearly half of bass boats
have this technology and employ it in some way or another. The fish are
adapting. It is nowhere near as easy as it was in the beginning. In his
interview with the Zaldains, Josh explains that he spent one whole day on a
massive school of big fish offshore without getting them to bite, despite his
wizardry with the sonar and trolling motor. After throwing everything in his
boat at them, he started to use crappie gear out of desperation. It worked. The
next day he returned to the school armed with compact swim jigs. He theorized
that the smaller nature of the crappie jigs worked. So, Josh trimmed a swim jig
down as far as he could so that the skirt only extended to the bend of the hook,
and he fished that jig out in front of big fish with no trailer on it.
Boom!
Big fish after big fish fell prey.
As Chris comments in the podcast, “Who does that?!?!”
And he is right. People don’t drop-shot A-Rigs or fish buzzcut trailer-less swim
jigs in cold, clear open water. That just isn’t normal. That’s some next-level,
front-facing sonar sorcery.
Tony Franceschi at the scales
(Photo courtesy of Craig Gottwals)
Dobyns Rods, Bass Cat, and P-Line pro, Tony Franceschi of Granite Bay,
California, analogizes it to deer hunting for bass. He explains that there has
never been a faster way to find concentrations of fish. And when you do find
them, you can use the sonar to scan those fish, looking for the biggest one the
way a deer hunter might glass the side of a mountain.
“Unless you quit fishing tournaments, you will buy it. I know you will. Without
it, you will struggle to be competitive in the cooler months when fish are
schooling,” Tony said to me. “And it leans right into the way you like to fish.”
As you must be starting to realize, this is nothing like any fishing you’ve ever
done before. On a typical tournament day, an angler might make 1,000 casts. Josh
might only make 50. As Tony said, you use the sonar to find concentrations of
fish, and then you are hunting for the largest one you can find. Whether you are
stalking that single big fish and working to dupe it with your longest, most
accurate cast or violently manhandling your trolling motor to stay on that big
fish while you incessantly dangle spoons, A-Rigs, and jigs in front of it until
it snaps is, I suppose, a matter of opinion, spin, or skill.
Whether we like it or not, bass fishing has made a quantum leap.
Ryan “D2D” White with a stud
smallmouth on California’s Trinity Lake (Photo courtesy of Craig Gottwals)
Oh, It’s Fishing Alright
Auburn, California Dobyns Rods, and Bass Cat pro,
Ryan White defends the tech as
strongly as I’ve heard.
“It’s here. We aren’t going back. Guys are just going to have to adapt and learn
it. And when they do, they’ll be amazed at the things they learn,” he told me.
My nickname for Ryan is Dark-to-Dark (D2D). He’s one of these folks who is so
eaten up with fishing that he can hardly stand to fish for less than a full day.
If you plan to fish on Saturday with Ryan, know that you are launching 45
minutes before the sun comes up, and you’ll barely be able to see the dock when
you idle in well after sundown. He’s going to grind all day whether we catch 100
or one, both of which we’ve done over the years.
I spent a day with D2D on a smaller California foothill lake known for stud
smallmouth and fat largemouth. It’s one of very few in northern California
that’s not yet been overrun with spotted bass. It was a tough day. We only put a
dozen fish in the boat, ten of which he caught. Had we been on my boat without
the forward-facing units, I don’t think we’d have caught more than four or five
fish.
There were large swaths of bank devoid of keeper fish. That blew my mind.
“Oh no, dude. We don’t waste time fishing until we find them now. That’s a thing
of the past,” he said.
Having fished with D2D most of my adult life, I figured we’d beat the bank with
reaction baits for the first one or two hours before we started looking for
offshore fish. We were offshore after about five casts.
“Fish aren’t there; they’re out here, see,” he said.
“Yeah, I see,” I said as I was tying on a Senko and a jig. Five casts into the
day, there was no need for the cranking and ripping rod.
Ryan “D2D” White with two
largemouth to anchor his limit (Photo courtesy of Craig Gottwals)
We spent the whole day out in 40 to 60 feet of water on an offshore ledge and
rockpile, that were not marked on the upgraded map chip. The elusive spot on a
spot, as bassers call it. And we found it before the sun even finished its
ascent.
We did drift over to different parts of the bank from time to time but quickly
returned to the deep water as we could see that is where the fish were,
particularly the big ones.
The bass behaved like weight-conscious girls before prom. They wouldn’t eat, no
matter what we offered them. We saw hundreds of big fish, but it didn’t matter.
I’m not sure what is more maddening, having no clue where they are, or seeing
them all around you and having virtually no chance to get them to bite. I think
the latter might be worse because when you don’t see them ignoring you, you
still have the hope of moving to a different part of the lake to “find” fish.
The way this unit has changed Ryan’s fishing style in less than a full year of
use boggled my mind. He used to fish with a dozen rods all piled on his deck as
he relentlessly switched from one bait to the next to crack the day’s code. He’d
switch to bright or dark-colored baits and say, “ya gotta show it to ‘em.” When
that didn’t work, he’d go with subtle, natural shades and say, “ya gotta hide it
from ‘em.”
When the bite got really tough, he’d downgrade to 5-pound fluorocarbon and a
sixteenth-ounce dart head with a four-inch Roboworm and turn to me, place his
finger over his lips in a shhh-fashion, and say, “slow fall,” in a quiet
librarian’s voice.
But on this day, I noticed he was cannonballing one-ounce jigs. This was before
Josh revealed what he was doing with A-Rigs, so I didn’t feel comfortable
spilling the beans, so to speak. I wanted to hear D2D’s explanation.
“Dude, forget all that. I don’t even carry that light stuff anymore. You need to
get down to the fish fast when you see them, or you’re just wasting time.”
“Really?”
“Yeah, it’s about getting it in their face quickly to see how they react. If
they swim over to it and look at it, you are going to catch them. You just have
to stay on them. Those are the fish that’ll bite.”
And that’s when it hit me.
That is exactly what Josh Jones says, but he’d not said it quite so publicly at
this point, so I knew D2D figured that out on his own, too.
Josh talks about how he can tell what kind of fish it is by its size, location,
whether it has a split in its tail, and how it reacts. He explains this in the
Zaldain interview. Once you know it is a bass, a massive piece of this puzzle is
reading how the fish reacts to your lure to determine if you believe that will
be a fish worth burning time on. And as Josh says, that is just something that’s
going to take experience for each angler.
So, I would not say this is “not fishing.” Yeah, it is like deer hunting in a
way, and I also totally understand Paul’s harass-a-bass term, but it is a sport
for sure. It’s just different now. You don’t need to waste time beating bassless
banks. You can see them, go to them, very quickly find the sweet spot on the
spot, and get to discerning what, if anything, will make them bite. And when
they don’t bite, you need to decide whether to employ your best pick-up-artist
techniques or to look for a more desperate dance partner.
What Happens to Derbies?
As I said, I’ve not installed it on my boat yet. Maybe I will this year as a
50th birthday present to myself. I’m still not sure. Gary has placed it on both
his California and Texas boats.
“Oh, trust me, I’m all mixed up on this thing. I like to beat the bank as much
as anyone, and that’s just not how Josh is doing it. He’s out in open water
whipping that trolling motor around looking, sometimes for twenty or thirty
minutes before he casts. But if a guy wants to compete in tournaments, Craig, I
don’t see any other way. There will be events on the California Delta, during
the spawn, or on Oroville, where it won’t matter. But over a whole circuit? I
think a guy is gonna need it.” Gary explained.
Those using the technology are already seeing the change in the fish. Just like
everything else in fishing, the fish learn. Split shotting, rip baits, Senkos,
drop-shots, the A-Rig, and now forward-facing sonar. Change is constant. But
unlike with new baits or, arrays of baits (A-Rig), forward-facing units aren’t
new enticements the fish can decide not to bite. They are tools that allow
fishermen to see and stay on the fish.
Most significantly, it allows an angler to fish for bass in the middle of a
lake, suspended in forty feet of water over a hundred-foot bottom. Those fish
virtually never saw a lure before. Now they can have the harass-a-bass technique
place every conceivable lure in an angler’s boat in its face. And the better
anglers get at staying on the fish, the more lures the bass will see.
Over the last three years, as we’ve seen more and more anglers employ this
technique, fishermen noticed that it is getting harder to get fish to bite. One
huge difference Gary points out, “is that the closer you are to the bass, the
worse things are. That has always been the case in bass fishing, but the
forward-facing units have supercharged that from what I’ve seen. There are times
now when you think you are being quiet, and stealthy, and you ease into a cove,
and you can see the fish on your screen slide back off the tops of rocks down
behind them once they feel your presence. They all duck for cover. Again, this
probably always existed, but we didn’t have the technology to see it. But I’m
here to tell you; it has gotten worse since I’ve been using the units.”
I asked Gary if he thinks that tournament organizations will outlaw the
technology. He winces a little, squints his eyes, and turns his head to the side
like he just took a bite of an unripe pear.
“I don’t. It is out there, and guys will want to use it. Plus, the sponsor
support from the manufacturers to the tourney orgs is going to be too much to
turn down. But I think we might see a place where some of the rookie leagues
spring up and think about banning it. I dunno, though; even that will be a tough
deal. I just hate that fully loaded glass boats are now $100,000, and guys feel
they need to drop $10 to $20K on sonar to compete. It’s not good for the sport.”
I agree with Gary. The units are here, and they will only get clearer and easier
to use. Most manufacturers are already on their second or third iteration of the
units. Fishermen won’t be able to turn back the clock any more than we can go
back to the early nineties and unplug the internet. Fish are adapting and
becoming that much warier of boats nearby, especially out in open water where
they historically had no serious concerns.
Richard Dobyns beat the bank for
this 10.46 lb. obese spot from California’s Bullard’s Bar Reservoir (Photo
courtesy of Craig Gottwals)
“The Winning Fish Are on the Bank”
Maybe I’m wrong. Maybe guys won’t need these units at all. I’m reminded of a
team championship on Lake Berryessa a few years ago. During pre-fish, it was an
uncharacteristically difficult bite. I’d retreated to island tops out in the
middle of the lake with a drop-shot and Senko. Spot-locked in one place for many
minutes at a time, I’d lightly shake, drag and dead-stick my fairy wand.
Richard Dobyns, pulled up and asked me, “how come whenever I see you, you’re way
the hell out in the middle of nowhere, spot-locked and fishing off the back
seat?”
“’Cause I’m not as good as you. I need to get out here and fish for the less
pressured fish. Plus, I’m kinda lazy,” I said with a smirk.
“Gottwals, you may have fun catching them out here, but this isn’t where this
tournament will be won. You need to go and catch them up there,” he said,
pointing to the bank.
Even though I knew what his answer would be, I asked Rich if he was going to add
the forward-facing units on his boat and start to look for big fish before he
casts.
“No way. You know me. If I can’t catch them shallow, then I’m gonna crash and
burn. Let these guys educate those fish out there. I’ll get them when they come
to the bank.”
Richard admits that there are times when he fishes a bit further offshore with
an A-Rig, ripbait, or crankbait. But if he can’t reach shore with a shotgun, it
is a rare event.
“I’ve never seen as many people spooning out in the middle of the lake as I saw
on Shasta and Oroville in the last two events,” Richard told me. “Good. I love
to see those guys out there. Educate those fish and keep the pressure off the
bank. I’m going to run my game shallow and let the chips fall where they may.”
It’s working out well so far for Richard this season. In a January event, he and
his team partner, James Avalos, finished second out of 109 teams on Lake Shasta.
And in February, they finished 31st out of 112 boats on Oroville. In the
Oroville event, Richard explains that they had the big bites to win and just
didn’t get it done. “We were in the right place. The bites were there. A little
bad luck and a little bad execution kept us from the podium, in that event.”
Richard Dobyns and James Avalos
take second at Shasta Lake (Photo courtesy of Craig Gottwals)
“There are always shallow fish. I don’t care what lake you are on or what time
of year. Bass like shallow water, and a guy does not need fifteen grand of sonar
to find ‘em. All the stuff we learned, growing up still applies. Yeah, there are
times when there are more fish out deep. And those are the times those units
will help. But I’m not sold that it’s going to be necessary. I’m not sold at
all. You still have to catch them, and the best way to do that is to fish your
strength,” Richard concluded.
Maybe he’s right. In fact, I hope he is right. I don’t think that any of us who
love the sport like to see the trend of $100,000 boats, $15,000 of sonar units,
and $2,000 entry fees where you’d better finish in the top three to make any
meaningful profit. Perhaps the best indicator of this is the meteoric growth in
the popularity of kayak fishing and the renewed popularity of aluminum boats at
a somewhat reduced price.
But as much as I’m rooting for the bank-beaters of the world, deep in my soul, I
know things have changed, dramatically. I do think we’ll always have
shallow-water savants like Rich out there who can compete without the units, but
my gut tells me that will constitute less than twenty percent of any pro event –
even in my most optimistic assessment. Once an angler sees harass-a-bass in
action, it’s going to be hard to get those images out of his head, even if it’s
to see a fish’s negative reaction to his bait.
I know that is what haunts me when I’m not catching them, now. I want to know
how many fish are under me. I want to know if they are looking at my
presentation bashfully, playing hard to get and ignoring me, or if they are
flaring from it like a duck from the shine of a gun barrel.
Richard Dobyns with a
shallow Shasta Lake spot (Photo courtesy of Craig Gottwals)
Harass-a-bass has those answers for you, my friend. And that information is only
$10,000 away. As for me, I’m going to wait for what I’m trademarking now as
FishLock™. With that tech, your unit will find the largest fish within its
100-foot scannable radius; you will press a button, your trolling motor will
stay on that fish, and you can get right to harassin’. You know that must be
coming.
|